Attention David Lovers!
First of all, WE ARE HERE TO STAY...This stampeding elephant can easily be stopped by the TRUTH! So prepare yourselves for the truth... HEY DAVID, RUN FOREST RUN! Cause you and your little lackies are gonna have to try better than a couple of threats! By the way..YOU GUYS ARE STARTING TO LOOK LIKE BIGGER IDIOTS BY TRYING TO ASSUME YOU KNOW WHO EVERYONE IS! AND..you wont get your posts on here if you dont use a user name....SO GROW A SET DAVID AND GET A SCREEN NAME!...Why dont you come on here and tell us YOUR lie...I MEAN SIDE of the story! Dont worry.. I am sure Bubba will enjoy the beer and ...was it cigarettes from 7-11? He might actually like the way you look in a BIG orange jumpsuit!...If you think you guys are going to intimidate anyone other than the buffet owners....BRING IT ON! I would call you Chief if you deserved it... but you dont so I wont! Instead...Lets see what kind of screen name should we give ya?..... BuffetKiller..NAW, Chiefblubberman...NAW...How about....PRISONERTOBE?? think they will have wedding ceremonies in jail? You and Miss Patty can talk about how you can each decorate the cells! Of course will you be in male side or female side? I understand David, you dont know either! Like I said once before...I DONT TAKE KINDLY TO THREATS.... I will be posting in next few days (hopefully) some good information for those of you that are still on the fence or for those of you that MAY open your eyes and see the lying poor excuse for a man!
Until later...Have good day!
Until later...Have good day!
21 Comments:
Hey BIG_RAM, usually I agree with what you say because like the rest of us you want people to get smart and understand the truth. However, I have to disagree with you when you said he may look good in that orange jumpsuit. As I said before, "not a slimming color'" Sorry. By the way, do the flip-flops usually match the jump suit? Accesories do matter ya know. GB
Goodness, Chief Syrkus must have caught you at something really bad, and embarrassed the crap out of the two of you. Why on earth would you spend so much time calling someone names, and telling half truths about him if he hadn’t done something to make you wish you hadn’t been caught with your pants down? This “Revenge” Blog has become insane. Seriously…. The two of you are ranting just as insanely as Susan Dieterlie and Dean Darling.
NO, I just dont like LIARS and people who threaten other people because they dont share the same view/dont wanna lie for them so they can have what they want! I also dont like people that think coersion and having idiots that believe EVERY word they say means that they have the power to push the little guys around... AND WHEN IT COMES TO SYRKUS, there are not many bigger! David couldnt catch a cheap hooker with her pants down! The only case he could handle is the one he brings over to his girlfriends house while his wife is away! OH WAIT, he was with a confidential informant.. Dont ask what she was helping him find!
I am trying to bring to light the LIES and CHEATING done by this man. If you see it as a rant then so-be-it! I actually wrote this section just for those that like to threaten others like David (soon to be someones little girl) Syrkus and his band of circus freaks. If you take offense to this then obviously you read the truth! I am sick of reading threats to me about different crap and to the other people that are brave enough to post on here... David, if you dont like it..TOUGH.. Circus freaks, if you dont like it... OPEN YOUR EYES and see what we are saying.
Until we have something else interesting to say..or more stuff to show you..... C-YA!
Hey Melbourne_Beach_Resident:
Syrcus didn't catch me at anything and didn't embarrass me either. He did gross me out when he actually thought that I would go out with him, AS IF. OK, maybe that was a little embarrassing, and he was with this present wife. So give us a freaking break with your bull crap. I can assure you what's being said here is the truth. You don't have to believe anything here, no one is asking you to and no one gives a damned if you do or don't. What do you know about this guy? First of all you can't know too much if your still sticking up for the idiot. And as far as the name calling, well he's everything we say plus some. Why are you on here anyway, you obviously have no clue about what's going on and certainly don't want to know the truth so go back to the "LYING" blog this one is about the truth.
When you resort to calling people names, and saying fairly obscene things about people you disagree with, you start to lose credibility. Calling people idiots, morons and freaks is no way to get them to listen to what ever it is you have to say.
If there is any truth in what you have to say, it is being lost in the abusive way you speak to people.
Mel Beach Resident... if you think that is rude then you havent spoken to your "friends".. They are the IDIOTS that sent me stuff under ANONYMOUS because they cant figure out how to create a user name. Some of the stuff is just plain bad! BUT, you are only as good as the people you associate yourself with so does this make you an idiot? ALSO, if people cant see the stuff written in black and white right in front of them then they MUST BE IDIOTS! OPEN YOUR EYES PEOPLE... STOP BEING PART OF THE CIRCUS ACT!
Melbourne beach resident, I understand what you are saying to a point. However, quit a few people took time out of their busy schedule to contribute to this investigation because for some reason the agency that should have done their job either wouldn't or couldn't. Syrcus should never have become a police officer much less a chief. Further, the truth will never be over shadowed by name calling. The truth is the truth no matter how it's delivered. Your buddy Syrcus has come on here with some pretty nasty stuff of his own, it's just not being posted. His "stuff" hasn't been posted because if was pretty bad. Unfortunalty for him, he can't control this site, as much as he would like to. Also, his friends run circles around us in the name calling department. These people are idiots and morons. If you don't like it you have the freedom not to look. Bye,
People, Let me put a little perspective into this issue.
True Story:
There is a women raising a beautiful 17 yr old daughter. Both of them having a very sweet and quite demeanor. This woman lives in a very rural area in SC. They live in a single wide mobile home, chop wood for heat. You can actually see the wood under what was supposed to be a vinyl floor but it's so worn you can see the wood separating them from the ground outside. This woman doesn't have a car that runs so she has to depend on others to take her to the store and to her job cleaning houses for other people. Her blue jeans were torn at the knee but yet she didn't complain or apologize. Very nice people.
Now, in comes David Syrcus:
David finds her after a long time, makes a trip up to SC to have her write a statement giving up any rights to money HE said didn't exist.
David was in this same trailor, saw the conditions, could see with his own eyes that this sweet woman could have used this money. But he makes the choice to continue with his plan to take advantage of her for his own gain. Where is his heart? Where is the honesty to do the right thing? And where is the ethics that a police chief is required to have in order to carry this badge that other chiefs and the general public hold in high regards. Are you seeing the problem here?
In comes FDLE:
They take a trip up to SC, they see the conditions, they have the evidence. Will they do the right thing? Do they see what David did to this woman? Do they have a heart? We'll see.
Were they trying to sweep this under the carpet when they informed him of the complaint and allowed him to file a counter complaint against the first party? There are a lot of questions to be answered and maybe Jeb Bush will get these answers. I for one will be sending them Christmas presents. Have a good day!
If "the truth will never be over shadowed by name calling" why do you even feel the need to engage in the behavior? I've asked questions, and you've called me a moron. The "pretty nasty stuff" is coming from both sides.
You are correct... I have the freedom not to look. But if I don't look, your message has no way of reaching me. Your message is getting lost in your offensive method of communication. If there is any truth in your message, it is lost as well. Bye,
The Florida Attorney General's Office sent the following response to an emailed request for an opinion regarding the compliance of this forum with Florida Sunshine Laws. While much of the information provided by the State concerns itself with online "meetings," I am hopeful that this forum will provide a means for informal communcation between Board Members where no decisions are made or votes taken.
One restriction mentioned is that public access terminals must be provided in order that the public can have access to the forums. Perhaps the terminals in the public libraries will satisfy this requirement?
At this time, the WAB has requested that the City Attorney provide whatever guidelines are required to make this forum compliant with the Florida Sunshine laws and accessible to the community. I remain commited to working the with the WAB, the City and the community to faciltating a better exchange of ideas and information. - Dave Bricker
---------
Subject: Electronic forums and Florida Sunshine Laws
Thank you for your recent email in which you state that you have
established an electronic discussion forum for the City of Miami Waterfront
Advisory Board members. You state that the forum is accessible to the
public and that all postings will be archived.
While this office cannot issue advisory opinions except at the request of a
majority of the members of the board, I am enclosing several previously
issued opinions which discuss the application of the Government in the
Sunshine Law to electronic meetings. You may wish to discuss the
application of these opinions with counsel for the Board. More information
about the Sunshine Law is available at the Office of the Attorney General
website: http://myfloridalegal.com/sunshine/.
Thank you for contacting the Office of Attorney General Charlie Crist.
Patricia R. Gleason
General Counsel
Enclosures: Informal to Syrkus; AGOs 01-66 and 02-32
___________________________
State of Florida
Office of the Attorney General
Informal Legal Opinion
Number: INFORMAL
Date: October 31, 2000
Subject: Sunshine Law; anonymous newsletter
The Honorable David Syrkus
Police Chief
Town of Melbourne Village
555 Hammock Road
Melbourne Village, Florida 32904-2513
GOVERNMENT IN THE SUNSHINE--PUBLIC MEETINGS--ELECTRONIC
COMMUNICATION--MUNICIPALITIES--anonymous newsletter used to communicate
among commissioners subject to Sunshine Law. s. 286.011, Fla. Stat.
Dear Chief Syrkus:
You ask whether a city commissioner who publishes an anonymous newsletter
using an e-mail address to receive feedback violates the Government in the
Sunshine Law when the newsletter is sent to and feedback is received from
fellow commissioners. You state that the commissioner uses the newsletter
to state his position on matters that will come before the commission and
solicits responses that are subsequently published.
Section 286.011(1), Florida Statutes, provides that "all meetings of any
board or commission of any state agency or authority or of any agency or
authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision .
. . at which official acts are to be taken are declared to be public
meetings open to the public at all times . . . ." The basic requirements
of the Government in the Sunshine Law are that meetings of a board or
commission be open to the public, reasonable notice of such meetings be
given, and minutes of the meeting be taken.
Florida courts repeatedly have stated that the entire decision making
process is subject to the Sunshine Law, and not just the formal assemblage
of a public body at which voting to ratify an official decision is carried
out. The statute extends to discussions and deliberations as well as to
formal action taken by a public body.[1] Therefore, the law is generally
applicable to any gathering where two or more members of a public board or
commission discuss some matter on which foreseeable action will be taken by
that board or commission.
As stated by the Supreme Court of Florida, however, the Sunshine Law is to
be construed "so as to frustrate all evasive devices."[2] The use of a
written report by one commissioner to inform other commissioners of a
subject which will be discussed at a public meeting is not violation of the
Sunshine Law, if prior to the meeting, there is no response or interaction
related to the report among the commissioners.[3] If, however, the report
is circulated among the board members for comments, with such comments
being provided to other members, there is an inappropriate interaction
among the members under the Sunshine Law.[4]
This office has found that the use of a computer by a board or commission
to communicate among themselves on issues pending before the board is
subject to the Sunshine Law.[5] Thus, the use of an electronic news letter
discussing matters that foreseeably may come before a board or commission
would be prohibited.
In this instance, the fact that the newsletter is anonymously written by
one of the commissioners does not alter the conclusions noted above. The
use of such an electronic newsletter facilitating communication among the
members of a public board or commission on matters that foreseeably may
come before the body for official action would be subject to the Government
in the Sunshine Law.
I trust these informal comments are of some assistance to you in resolving
this matter.
Sincerely,
Lagran Saunders
Assistant Attorney General
ALS/tgk
wondered what he did all day?
Here you go Melbourne Beach Resident. Case in point: The "Woodpecker" was a monthly news letter sent out by a person in MV. In it was information about the goings on in MV, good and bad. This little paper really got under david's skin because it made him look bad. How did David Syrkus find her? Used his position as chief to sepoena the AOL records to find out the person behind the email address. Sorry, Allegedly. The story is somewhere in this blog, I suggest you read the WHOLE BLOG. I just happened to go through all of your posts to see where your coming from with these last couple of posts of yours. Since you really do not contribute much if any. In one of your posts you asked why we hate Melbourne Beach. We don't, sorry your little town has THIS Chief. Don't blame us, blame the shotty backround check. You also made a half ass attempt on one of your posts to give David an excuse for what he did by saying "he cut his losses." What I didn't see, was your response to the other person who posted right after yours saying he did indeed receive a check for 65K. Want the check number? Therefore, it is my opinion that you are a friend of davids. You also wanted to know who we are by name. Why? I'm sure you don't want to get to know us since you don't like the way we play. So I say to you, BYE! Do not address me, if you need to talk then go talk to David. If you want to talk to us then bring something to the table conducive to the subject. I'm not into people who whine and complain about, "oh, they hate our town," and "oh, their calling David names," and oh this and oh that. Do you hear Dean Darling, whom by the way, has never posted one single post on any of the blogs crying about anything? No you don't. Do you hear his ex, a true victim in all of this whining about anything on this blog. NO you don't! Go back and read your posts and then tell me why your here. Maybe your sad sue. Who cares who you are. And who cares about the name calling, didn't hear me whining when someone called me a lesbian. I know I'm not, therefore it doesn't bother me. In fact, I made light of it. So what, someone called you a MORON should I call you a WAMMM-bulance? Get a grip and stop coming on here to defend David Syrkus, your words are wasted here if that is your intent. No response needed. BYE
Oh, one more thing Melbourne Beach Resident, nothing I have said thus far has been obscene. My credibility is just fine thank you because I have put my money where my mouth is. How about you?
To the REAL MELBOURNE BEACH CITIZENS:
Syrkus' charges have been forwarded to our State Attorny's office, we are asking that everyone write Norm's office and ask for the maximum punishment as Syrkus is a police chief and theoretically is held to a higher standard but broke the law anyway.
Now I am wondering about this here letter to the AG. It really is sad, This guy is facing felony allegations and he is trying to shift the focus onto something else. If i were him, I would be worried about more troubling issues such as: What goes with the Jail uniforms, and seeing the doctor to have my sphinchter surgically closed so bubba doesnt do too much damage. Actually it may not be too bad as if he does go to prision he will be among some of his son's friends and they will take care of him.
Hey Melbeacher; you just showed you intelligence. You call people who want to see the right thing done vindictive and destructive. Where are you coming from with this crap? Are you proof reading your posts? Or are you really David or his wife? You MORON do you know that if a reporter catches a story it's because someone srewed up! If that person wasn't doing something wrong they wouldn't be in the news. Why don't you ask the real victim here how she feels about being screwed out of thousands of dollars when she has a beautiful daughter to raise. What do you say about that. Probably nothing because you really don't care. Do You?
"Cause you and your little lackies are gonna have to try better than a couple of threats! "
Were you aware that "lackies" is a racialized term with its origins in slavery? Or, maybe it doesn't matter. Sometimes, the truth we seek is the truth that affirms who we are...(please see A. McInyre, 1997; D. Roediger, 1997 and 1999; G. Howard, 1999; and D. Bell, 2004). Happy reading!
Mel, I have my facts straight! They have been laid out all over this blog but obviously you either haven't read them or can't remember what you've read. If your not David or his wife then why are you fighting against the FACTS so hard? Innocent until proven guilty, yes absolutly. However, the evidence is as such that a resonable person can see exactly what he's done. The evidence speaks for itself. You haven't seen the evidence so just sit tight and you'll see soon. I don't need a jury to tell me what I already know. Now mel, I haven't REALLY talked "crap" about you, just stated a few facts, sorry if it bothers you, ya really haven't spoken much to the issue just a lot of defending David and insulting the people here, don't shoot the messenger.
nonwhite&woman:
Yes I am. And I am sure "race" had nothing to do with that statement. These days it's used to describe people like David Syrkus who use people to fight the battles he starts. Do you know this person we are talking about? If so, then you probably already know he is the type of person who will start things and sit back and watch while the bickering goes on and on and on. Only this time he went a little too far and stayed in a small town where people actually talk to each other. He moves around quit a bit. He gets run out of one place and ends up in another until people get to know him and he has to move again. Read the story about the ex that he cheated out of thousands of dollars. Take a look at the house he lives in that he got by stepping all over anyone he could to get to live in that little gated community. Or how about the cabin in the carolinas. The woman he screwed out of thousands of dollars would probably be pretty happy to have just a little bit of what David has, she paid for some of it. I haven't seen you on here before and your are totally welcome here. Thanks for the info.
Mel, one more thing. I am taking this personally, absolutly! You should be as well, he's your cheif and he's a discrace.
Mel, your living a double standard, I saw you on the "other" blog slamming Walters and Darling. Wanna explain how your not vindictive or ignorant? Sounds like you live in a glass house to me.
melbeacher \
we feel the same way about syrcus and Gugeletia. Both lied to get a job. Both pretend to know what they are doing. Both have problems telling the truth. Both lied about having a college degree. Both spend a lot of time conning the citizens of the town. Both will be gone by this time next year.
Melbeacher, Ok, sounds good.
Post a Comment
<< Home